Building Meaningful Obedience: An Analysis of Teacher Pedagogical Competence from the Perspective of Matthew 23:12 at SMA Negeri 1 Kutabuluh

Main Article Content

Rithawaty Ginting

Abstract

This study investigates how teacher pedagogical competence contributes to the formation of meaningful student obedience through the interpretive lens of Matthew 23:12 at SMA Negeri 1 Kutabuluh. The research was motivated by the growing need to move beyond compliance-based discipline toward value-based character formation in contemporary education. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis involving teachers, students, and school leadership. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns in the enactment of pedagogical authority and student responses. The findings reveal that while teachers generally demonstrate adequate procedural pedagogical competence, the depth of student obedience varies significantly depending on how authority is relationally embodied. Classrooms characterized by directive and control-oriented approaches tend to produce situational compliance, whereas servant-oriented pedagogy, marked by humility, relational care, and moral explanation, fosters more voluntary and internalized obedience. The exegetical reflection on Matthew 23:12 reinforces the educational importance of authority grounded in humility rather than dominance. The study concludes that pedagogical competence becomes transformative when integrated with servant leadership principles and authentic teacher modeling. It recommends strengthening professional development in relational pedagogy, reflective teacher identity, and value-based classroom assessment. These findings contribute to the discourse on Christian-informed character education and offer practical insights for improving teacher professionalism in pluralistic public-school contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crippen, C. (2010). Serve, teach, and lead: It’s all about relationships. Insight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 5, 27–36.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Groome, T. H. (2011). Will there be faith? A new vision for educating and growing disciples. HarperOne.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00406