Hospitality in Action Exploring the Social Competence of Christian Religious Education Teachers through Genesis 18:3–5 at SMP Negeri Satu Atap 3 Tewah
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines hospitality as an expression of social competence among Christian teachers at SMP Negeri Satu Atap 3 Tewah, drawing theological insight from Genesis 18:3–5. Using a qualitative approach, the research involved ten Christian teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and reflective documentation, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that hospitality is practiced through relational awareness, inclusive engagement, emotional support, proactive service, and the modeling of Christian values. Teachers who intentionally welcomed students, listened empathetically, and ensured equitable participation fostered classroom environments characterized by trust, openness, and collaboration. These hospitable practices strengthened teacher-student relationships and enhanced students’ willingness to engage in learning. The study also found that hospitality was understood not merely as professional courtesy but as a theological responsibility inspired by the example of Abraham in Genesis 18:3–5. This biblical framework motivated teachers to embody care, attentiveness, and fairness in their interactions. Despite practical challenges such as time constraints, hospitality was sustained through simple relational gestures, demonstrating that it is rooted more in attitude than in resources. Ultimately, the research highlights that hospitality functions as a practical dimension of social competence that bridges faith and pedagogy. By integrating biblical values into professional conduct, Christian teachers contribute to a supportive and inclusive learning environment. The study affirms that hospitality enhances not only relational harmony but also the effectiveness of educational practice in Christian Religious Education contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. Bantam Books.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
Jolliffe, D. (2016). The benevolent patriarch: Genesis 18–19 and the ethics of hospitality. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 40(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089216631142
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.