Social Competence of Christian Religious Education Teachers in Fostering Inclusive Relationships: A Reflection on Philippians 1:3-5 at SMA Negeri 1 Lahewa Timur
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the social competence of Christian Religious Education (CRE) teachers in fostering inclusive relationships within a public school context, with specific reference to SMA Negeri 1 Lahewa Timur. Grounded in both educational theory and a theological reflection on Philippians 1:3-5, the study explores how biblical values inform teachers’ social interactions in pluralistic learning environments. Using a qualitative reflective approach, this research integrates a systematic review of recent literature on teacher social competence, inclusive education, and Christian pedagogy with a contextual analysis of the educational setting. The reflection on Philippians 1:3-5 highlights key relational principles-gratitude, joy, and partnership (koinonia)-which provide a theological foundation for inclusive educational practices. These principles are examined in relation to the professional responsibilities of CRE teachers in public schools characterized by religious and cultural diversity. The findings indicate that socially competent CRE teachers play a vital role in creating inclusive classroom climates that promote mutual respect and a sense of belonging. By embodying relational values rooted in Christian theology, teachers are able to engage students without imposing exclusivist attitudes, thereby supporting tolerance and social harmony. The study also reveals that social competence functions as a mediating factor between faith-based instruction and inclusive educational practice. This research affirms that social competence grounded in biblical reflection enhances the effectiveness of Christian Religious Education in public schools. The integration of theological values and professional social skills offers a meaningful contribution to inclusive education and teacher development in multicultural contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dewey, J. (2016). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Free Press. (Original work published 1916)
Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2017). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton University Press.
Hollins, E. R. (2015). Culture in school learning: Revealing the deep meaning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753402
Knight, G. R. (2016). Philosophy and education: An introduction in Christian perspective (4th ed.). Andrews University Press.
Lickona, T. (2018). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Parker, P. (2017). Pauline partnership and community formation in Philippians. Baker Academic.
Siregar, R., & Simanjuntak, F. (2021). Kompetensi sosial guru pendidikan agama Kristen dalam konteks pendidikan multikultural. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen 12(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/abcd1
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. (2019). Teaching as a Christian practice: Faith, formation, and pedagogy. Eerdmans Publishing.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Thomas, G. (2017). How to do your research project: A guide for students (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Wright, N. T. (2019). Paul: A biography. HarperOne.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.