Teacher Competence in Christian Religious Education within Faith-Based and Ecological Learning at SDN 107434 Rumah Liang
Main Article Content
Abstract
Christian Religious Education (CRE) in primary schools plays a pivotal role in shaping not only students’ doctrinal knowledge but also their moral, spiritual, and ecological responsibility. This study examines the competence of CRE teachers at SDN 107434 Rumah Liang, with particular attention to how faith-based learning is integrated with ecological awareness. The research seeks to understand how pedagogical, spiritual, and ecological dimensions are embodied in classroom practices and contribute to students’ holistic formation. Adopting a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from five purposefully selected teachers through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns in the integration of Christian pedagogy with ecological values, while triangulation ensured the credibility and trustworthiness of findings. The results reveal three interrelated dimensions of teacher competence. First, faith-based competence was evident as teachers consistently linked biblical teachings to students’ daily experiences, emphasizing discipleship, stewardship, and moral responsibility. Second, pedagogical competence was demonstrated through inclusive scheduling, interactive learning methods, and a focus on character formation. Third, ecological competence was reflected in the integration of environmental stewardship within religious instruction, including activities such as gardening, waste management, and ecological reflection rooted in biblical principles. Despite limited resources, teachers displayed innovation and commitment, though infrastructural and material constraints remained challenges. This study concludes that CRE teachers at SDN 107434 Rumah Liang embody a holistic model of competence that unites faith formation with ecological stewardship. Such integration underscores the transformative potential of faith-based ecological education in preparing students to become spiritually mature and environmentally responsible citizens.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Astley, J. (2002). Ordinary theology: Looking, listening, and learning in theology. Ashgate.
Bouma-Prediger, S. (2001). For the beauty of the earth: A Christian vision for creation care. Baker Academic.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Conradie, E. M. (2011). God, creation, and sustainability: Essays in reformed theology. Wipf and Stock.
Conradie, E. M. (2020). Ecological theology: A guide for further research. Stellenbosch: SUN Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teaching for deeper learning: Tools for engagement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Edwards, D. (2019). Growing up with creation: Explorations in Christian ecological education. Cascade Books.
Fowler, J. W. (1995). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Groome, T. H. (2019). Christian religious education: Sharing our story and vision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Groome, T. H. (2019). Christian religious education: Sharing our story and vision. JOS se-Bass.
Habel, N., & Trudinger, P. M. (2008). The Bible and ecology: Rediscovering the community of creation. William Carey Library.
Jackson, R. (2016). Rethinking religious education and plurality: Issues in diversity and pedagogy. Routledge.
Knight, G. R. (2006). Philosophy & education: An introduction in Christian perspective (4th ed.). Andrews University Press.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., et al. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Simanjuntak, M. (2021). Religious education in Indonesian schools: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Religious and Ethical Education, 5(2), 112–128.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.
White, L. (2006). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.
Wright, C. J. H. (2004). The mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s grand narrative. InterVarsity Press.