Pedagogical Competence of Christian Religious Education Teachers and Efforts to Foster Student Motivation: Learning from Jesus as the Master Teacher at SD Negeri 5 Ronggurnihuta

Main Article Content

Ratnawati Sitanggang
Herdiana Sihombing

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between pedagogical competence and student motivation in Christian Religious Education (CRE), taking inspiration from Jesus Christ as the Master Teacher. Conducted at SD Negeri 5 Ronggurnihuta, a public elementary school in North Tapanuli, this research emphasizes how faith-informed pedagogy can cultivate students’ intellectual engagement and spiritual growth simultaneously. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) as the primary methodsupplemented by qualitative insights from classroom practices-the study integrates educational theory, theology, and contextual application. Findings reveal that the CRE teacher demonstrates pedagogical competence grounded in relational engagement, contextual sensitivity, and reflective spirituality. Lessons connect biblical truths to students’ lived experiences, transforming abstract theology into practical faith. Through relational teaching, prayerful routines, and empathy-driven instruction, the teacher nurtures intrinsic motivation based on care, relevance, and belonging, aligning with self-determination theory and the moral education. Reflective practice further strengthens teaching quality by aligning pedagogical growth with spiritual formation, concept of teaching from integrity and inner vocation. Theologically, the teacher’s Christ-centered pedagogy-emphasizing empathy before instruction, dialogue over monologue, and transformation above information-mirrors Jesus’ model of compassionate teaching. Students’ responses indicate increased joy, moral awareness, and engagement in faith-based actions. The study concludes that pedagogical competence in CRE is not merely technical proficiency but a sacred vocation integrating intellect, empathy, and faith. When grounded in Christ’s example, teaching transcends instruction to become discipleship, shaping students who learn not only about God but with God, embodying love, humility, and service in daily life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Bevans, S. B. (2002). Models of contextual theology. Orbis Books.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report). Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.

Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. Jossey-Bass.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2004). Multikulturalisme: Tantangan-tantangan global masa depan dalam transformasi pendidikan nasional. Grasindo.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.