The Influence of the Talking Stick Learning Model on the Learning Activeness of Christian Religious Education and Character Education Students in Grade VIII of SMP Negeri 3 Siborongborong
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of the Talking Stick learning model on the learning activeness of eighth-grade students in Christian Religious Education and Character at SMP Negeri 3 Siborongborong during the 2025/2026 Academic Year. The research hypothesis posits: "There is a positive and significant effect of the Talking Stick learning model on the learning activeness of eighth-grade students in Christian Religious Education and Character at SMP Negeri 3 Siborongborong during the 2025/2026 Academic Year." The population comprises all eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 3 Siborongborong in the 2025/2026 Academic Year, totaling 102 students. The sample for the study was determined using a purposive sampling technique, where Class VIII C served as the experimental group and Class VIII D as the control group. This study employed a quantitative research method, specifically a Quasi-Experimental Design with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The research instrument was a questionnaire consisting of 28 items. The questionnaire data were analyzed using the formula for the difference in means (N-Gain Score). The average N-Gain score for the experimental class was found to be 0.7395, which falls into the high category. The average N-Gain score for the control class was 0.1862, which falls into the low category. Subsequently, an independent samples t-test was conducted, yielding a calculated t-value (tcount) of 12.481, which is greater than the critical t-value (ttable) of 2.000 (at α=0.05 with df=58). Therefore, it is concluded that the research hypothesis (Ha) is accepted—meaning there is a positive and significant effect of the Talking Stick learning model on the learning activeness of eighth-grade students in Christian Religious Education and Character at SMP Negeri 3 Siborongborong during the 2025/2026 Academic Year—and the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Amin, linda Yurike susan sumendap. 164 Model Pembelajaran Kontemporer. Bekasi Timur: LPPM, 2022.
Aqib Zainal. Model-Model, Media, Dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Penerbit Yrama Widya, 2021.
Arikunto. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT RINEKA CIPTA, 2002.
Azizah, Et al. Buku Panduan Model Pembelajaran Nobangan. Guepedia, 2022.
Daryanto. Belajar Dan Mengajar. Bandung: CV Yrama Widya, 2016.
Elfachmi Amin Kneifi. Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2016.
GP Harianto. Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dalam Alkitab & Dunia Pendidikan Masa Kini. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2012.
Homrighousen E.G. Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia, 2008.
Huda Miftahul. Model-Model Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.
Istarani. 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Medan: Media Persada, 2015.
Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia, Alkitab Terjemahan Baru. Jakarta: LAI, 2002.
Mandagi, Mieke. Book Chapter Inovasi Pembelajaran Di Pendidikan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.
Mencelina Sihotang, Simion D. Harianja, Limmarten Simatupang, Lustani Samosir, Risden Anakampun. “Pengaruh Kreativitas Mengajar Guru Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Budi Pekerti Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Pangururan Kabupaten Samosir Tahun Pembelajaran 2023/2024.” Jurnal Yudistira : Publikasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Bahasa 1, no. 4 (2023): 226–79. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.61132/yudistira.v1i4.235.
Mudjiono & Dimyati. Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT RINEKA CIPTA, 2013.
Octavia Shilphy A. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2020.
Priansa, Donni Juni. Pengembangan Strategi & Model Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV PUSTAKA SETIA, 2017.
Rokhanah, Nur, Asri Widowati, and Eko Hari Sutanto. “Peningkatan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Dengan Menerapkan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD).” Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 3, no. 5 (2021): 3173–80. https://doi.org/10. 31004/ edukatif. v3i5.860.
Shoimin Aris. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: AR-RUZZ Media, 2016.
Siburian Westy Warlianty, Simion D Harianja, Robert K A Simangunsong, Taripar Aripin Samosir, Damayanti Nababan. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Budi Pekerti Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Sitiotio Kabupaten Samosir Tahun Pembelajaran 2023/2024.” Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pendidikan Agama 1, no. 4 (2023): 1–15.
Sinar. Metode Active Learning Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.
Sudjana Nana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2017.
Tambunan Susanti, Simion Harianja, Eduward Hottua Hutabarat, Robert Simangunsong, and Rawatri Sitanggang. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Role Playing Terhadap Minat Belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen Dan Budi Pekerti Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Lae Parira Tahun Pembelajaran 2023/2024.” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Teologi 1, no. 4 (2023): 232–48.
Uno, Hamzah B. Belajar Dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2015.
Wahyuningsih, Endang Sri. Model Pembelajaran Mastery Learning Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2020.