The Humility of Teachers in Serving Based on Genesis 3:19 as a Model for Students at SD N 091463 Parapat
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the implementation of teacher humility in service based on the theological foundation of Genesis 3:19 and its impact as a character model for students at SD N 091463 Parapat. Genesis 3:19 emphasizes human mortality and the importance of recognizing one's limitations, which can be interpreted as a basis for developing humility in the educational context. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with case study methods, this research involved 12 teachers and 60 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participatory observations, and documentation analysis. The findings reveal that teachers who demonstrate humility through respectful service, acknowledgment of limitations, and dedication to student development positively influence students' character formation. Students exhibited increased respect, empathy, and collaborative attitudes. However, challenges persist, including limited understanding of theological concepts in pedagogical practice and inconsistencies in modeling behavior. This study recommends developing training programs that integrate biblical values with character education and establishing monitoring systems to ensure consistency in teacher exemplary behavior. The research contributes to educational theory by connecting theological principles with character education practices in elementary school contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Konsep dan pedoman penguatan pendidikan karakter. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Lickona, T. (2004). Character matters: How to help our children develop good judgment, integrity, and other essential virtues. New York, NY: Touchstone.
Muslich, M. (2011). Pendidikan karakter: Menjawab tantangan krisis multidimensional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nucci, L. P., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of moral and character education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Piper, J. (2004). Don't waste your life. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.
Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational psychology (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Widiastuti, N., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Peran keteladanan guru dalam pendidikan karakter siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 9(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v9i2.23342
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.