The Influence of Interpersonal Communication of Christian Religious Education Teachers on Students’ Discipline at SDN 157016 Lubuk Ampolu
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of interpersonal communication by Christian Religious Education (CRE) teachers on students’ discipline at SDN 157016 Lubuk Ampolu-where tardiness and rule-bending seem to have achieved Olympic-level mastery. Education, at its heart, is a grand choreography of intellect, morality, and spirit, and CRE teachers play both conductor and counselor in this delicate dance. Using a quantitative correlational design supported by qualitative insights, the research explores how teachers’ openness, empathy, supportiveness, and honesty shape students’ behavioral and moral self-regulation. Data were collected through questionnaires from 60 students in grades IV-VI and complemented by interviews with teachers and students, because numbers alone, as we know, never tell the whole story (and sometimes lie politely). Statistical analysis using simple linear regression revealed a significant positive correlation (R² = 0.412, p < 0.05), indicating that nearly half of the variation in student discipline can be attributed to teachers’ interpersonal communication-an impressive feat, considering the remaining 58.8% is probably influenced by parents, peers, and Pokémon. Qualitative findings further highlight that communication grounded in empathy and faith transforms discipline from a fear-based compliance into a voluntary moral choice rooted in Christian virtue. In essence, the study affirms that when teachers speak not just to students’ ears but also to their souls-with patience, love, and the occasional divine wink-discipline ceases to be punishment and becomes formation. Effective communication, therefore, is both pedagogy and ministry, nurturing students who are not only obedient but spiritually anchored in the teachings of Christ.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book (15th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled interpersonal communication: Research, theory and practice (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Knight, G. R. (2016). Philosophy and education: An introduction in Christian perspective (5th ed.). Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press.
Lestari, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). The role of dialogical communication in improving students’ character discipline in elementary education. Journal of Educational Development and Practice 8(2), 45-57.
Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Boston, MA: Springer.
Rahmat, A., & Setiawan, I. (2020). The influence of teacher interpersonal communication on the development of students’ character at the elementary level. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy 5(1), 67-79.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
The Holy Bible. (2011). New International Version. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. (Galatians 5:22–23; Ephesians 4:2)